illiterate
illiterate a. 文盲的;无知的 n.文盲;失学者 能签名者也可能是文盲,因此仅将不会签名的人描述为文盲是不合适的。文盲对自己所签署的文件如声称并证明是他人错误地念给他听的,可以不受该文件的约束,并可被认为是受了欺诈;该规定同样也适用于盲人和不懂该国语言的外国人。
illiterate a. 文盲的;无知的 n.文盲;失学者 能签名者也可能是文盲,因此仅将不会签名的人描述为文盲是不合适的。文盲对自己所签署的文件如声称并证明是他人错误地念给他听的,可以不受该文件的约束,并可被认为是受了欺诈;该规定同样也适用于盲人和不懂该国语言的外国人。
literacy qualification 〈美〉读写能力资格 指陪审员应具备的资格。有时直接用来指作为陪审员应具备的最低或适当的教育程度;有时则间接地规定必须具有读写能力方可登记为选民,然后要求陪审员应从具备此种条件的选民名单中选出。
literacy qualification Read More »
litera (lit-[schwa]r-[schwa]), n. [Latin “letter”] Hist. 1. A letter. 2. The letter of a law, as distinguished from its spirit. — Also spelled littera. Pl. literae. See LETTER(3).
Copyright. Similarity evidenced by the copying of verbatim portions of the protected work.
fragmented literal similarity Read More »
National Institute for Literacy. A federally aided institute that leads national efforts to achieve universal literacy. — Abbr. NIFL.
national institute for literacy Read More »
law and literature. (often cap.) 1. Traditionally, the study of how lawyers and legal institutions are depicted in literature; esp., the examination of law-related fiction as sociological evidence of how a given culture, at a given time, views law. — Also termed law in literature. 2. More modernly, the application of literary theory to legal
law and literature Read More »
Foedera, Conventiones, Literae et cujuscunque Generis Acta Publica 〈拉〉《条约、协议、公文及所有一般官方文件集》 由托马斯·赖默〔Thomas Rymer〕和罗伯特·桑德森〔Robert Sanderson〕汇编,1704-1735年首次出版,收录有1066年至1654年间英格兰国王与其他君王及国家之间的条约、协议、公文及其他官方文件,是有关历史和国际关系的珍贵原始资料。
Foedera, Conventiones, Literae et cujuscunque Generis Acta Publica Read More »
literae patentes (lit-[schwa]r-ee p[schwa]-ten-teez), n. [Latin “open letters”] Hist. A public grant from the sovereign to a subject, conferring the right to land, a franchise, a title, liberty, or some other endowment. • The modern “patent” and, more closely, “letters patent” derive from this term. See LETTERS PATENT(1). “The term ‘patent’ is short for ‘letters
Patents. Infringement in which every element and every limitation of a patent claim is present, exactly, in the accused product or process. Cf. DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS. [Cases: Patents 226. C.J.S. Patents §§ 400, 404, 406–407.]
literal infringement Read More »