Search Results for: RULE, THE

golden rule argument

golden-rule argument. A jury argument in which a lawyer asks the jurors to reach a verdict by imagining themselves or someone they care about in the place of the injured plaintiff or crime victim. • Because golden-rule arguments ask the jurors to become advocates for the plaintiff or victim and to ignore their obligation to

golden rule argument Read More »

antidissection rule

antidissection rule. Trademarks. A rule, applied in comparing potentially conflicting marks, that requires that the marks be compared as a whole or as they are viewed by consumers in the marketplace, not broken down into their component parts. • The antidissection rule does not preclude an analysis of the dominant and subordinate features of a

antidissection rule Read More »

golden rule

The principle that, in construing written instruments, a court should adhere to the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words unless that adherence would lead to some manifest absurdity; esp., in statutory construction, the principle that if a statute’s literal meaning would lead to an absurd or unjust result, or even to an inconsistency within

golden rule Read More »

mailbox rule

mailbox rule. 1. Contracts. The principle that an acceptance becomes effective — and binds the offeror — once it has been properly mailed. • The mailbox rule does not apply, however, if the offer provides that an acceptance is not effective until received. [Cases: Contracts 22(1).C.J.S. Contracts §§ 46–51, 53–54; Trading Stamps and Coupons§§ 7–9.]

mailbox rule Read More »

(1856) Rule in Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856)

(1856) Rule in Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) 〈英〉不列颠皇家银行诉特克恩德案规则 在该案中,虽然未经公司股东会议的决议授权,但盖有公司印章并有公司两位经理签字的债券仍被法庭裁定为有效,因为贷款人有权认为所需的决议是存在的,一切事情都应推定为已正确地完成〔omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta〕。

(1856) Rule in Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) Read More »

durham rule

Durham rule. Criminal law. A test for the insanity defense, holding that a defendant is not criminally responsible for an act that was the product of mental disease or defect (Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954)). • Formerly used in New Hampshire and the District of Columbia, the Durham rule has

durham rule Read More »

Scroll to Top