Miller-Tydings Act
Miller-Tydings Act 〈美〉《米勒-泰丁法》 1937年联邦制定法,系《谢尔曼反托拉斯法》〔Sherman Anti-Trust Act〕的修正,它规定商品零售统一最低价格协议不应被视为非法,只要此类协议是合法订立的。该法于1975年被《消费商品定价法》〔Consumer Goods Pricing Act〕取代。
Miller-Tydings Act Read More »
Miller-Tydings Act 〈美〉《米勒-泰丁法》 1937年联邦制定法,系《谢尔曼反托拉斯法》〔Sherman Anti-Trust Act〕的修正,它规定商品零售统一最低价格协议不应被视为非法,只要此类协议是合法订立的。该法于1975年被《消费商品定价法》〔Consumer Goods Pricing Act〕取代。
Miller-Tydings Act Read More »
A partnership that any partner may dissolve at any time without thereby incurring liability. Cf. partnership for a term. [Cases: Partnership 259.5. C.J.S. Partnership §§ 303–305.]
partnership at will Read More »
illusory appointment 〈英〉虚假处分 指对处分权〔power of appointment〕下的财产进行名义上的、附加限制或附加条件的处分。依照先前的规定,违背非经创设处分权的法律文件之特别授权即不得为独占性处分〔exclusive appointment〕的规则,将名义上的财产份额处分给权利人中的一个,则该处分行为在衡平法上是虚假并无效的。但这一规则在英格兰已经废除。 (→Illusory Appointment Act;power of appointment)
illusory appointment Read More »
scintilla juris (sin-til-[schwa] joor-is). [Law Latin “a spark of right”] Hist. A fragment of law or right. • This refers to a figurative expression in the law of uses providing a trace of seisin rights to remain in the feoffees sufficient to allow contingent uses to be executed under the Statute of Uses. It was
A written promise to pay that is not under seal and has no penalty for failure to pay. — Also termed single bill. Cf. bill penal.
illegal a. 不合法的;违法的;非法的;违反规则的 该词被普遍使用,含义及后果不甚明确。它可以指法律直接禁止的行为,如谋杀、阻塞公路等;也可以指违反法定义务或社会公共政策并不可强制执行的行为。行为的不合法性不仅在于因其违反法律而对行为者施加刑事处罚,而且因为该行为得不到法律的承认,也无从产生权利,只能对由此造成的损失进行补救。它经常与「非法」〔unlawful〕同义使用。
A formal, detailed statement of the claims or charges brought by a plaintiff or a prosecutor, usu. filed in response to the defendant’s request for a more specific complaint. • The bill of particulars has been abolished in federal civil actions and replaced by the motion for a more definite statement. See Fed. R. Civ.
bill of particulars Read More »
quaerens nihil capiat per billam (kweer-enz nI-hil kap-ee-[schwa]t p[schwa]r bil-[schwa]m). [Law Latin] Hist. Let the plaintiff take nothing by his bill. • This was a form of judgment for the defendant.
quaerens nihil capiat per billam Read More »