Search Results for: NTIA

harmless error

An error that does not affect a party’s substantive rights or the case’s outcome. • A harmless error is not grounds for reversal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 61; Fed. R. Crim. P. 52. — Also termed technical error; error in vacuo. Cf. substantial error. [Cases: Administrative Law and Procedure 764; Appeal and Error 1025–1074.

harmless error Read More »

chattel real

A real-property interest that is less than a freehold or fee, such as a leasehold estate. • The most important chattel real is an estate for years in land, which is considered a chattel because it lacks the indefiniteness of time essential to real property. — Also termed real chattel. [Cases: Property 4. C.J.S. Property

chattel real Read More »

spillover theory

The principle that a severance must be granted only when a defendant can show that trial with a codefendant would substantially prejudice the defendant’s case, as when the jury might wrongly use evidence against the defendant. See BRUTON ERROR. [Cases: Criminal Law 622.2(8). C.J.S. Criminal Law §§ 570–571.]

spillover theory Read More »

unitization

Oil & gas. The collection of producing wells over a reservoir for joint operations such as enhanced-recovery techniques. • Unitization is usu. carried out after primary production has begun to fall off substantially, in order to permit efficient secondary-recovery operations. It is also done to comply with well-spacing requirements established by state law or regulation.

unitization Read More »

noncustodial parent

In the child-custody laws of some states, a parent without the primary custody rights of a child; esp., the parent not awarded physical custody of a child in a divorce. • The noncustodial parent is typically awarded visitation with the child. — Also termed nonresidential parent; possessory conservator; absent parent. See PHYSICAL CUSTODY(2). Cf. custodial

noncustodial parent Read More »

capital risk test

capital-risk test. Securities. A method of determining whether a transaction constitutes an investment contract (subject to securities laws), whereby if a substantial portion of the capital used by a franchiser to start its operations is provided by a franchisee, then the transaction is treated as an investment contract. [Cases: Securities Regulation 5.10. C.J.S. Securities Regulation

capital risk test Read More »

Scroll to Top