Search Results for: GREE

compounding a crime

compounding a crime. The offense of either agreeing not to prosecute a crime that one knows has been com-mitted or agreeing to hamper the prosecution. — Also termed compounding a felony; (archaically) theftbote. See STIFLING OF A PROSECUTION . [Cases: Compounding Offenses 1. C.J.S. Compounding Offenses § 1.] “If a prosecuting attorney should accept money

compounding a crime Read More »

integration rule

integration rule. The rule that if the parties to a contract have embodied their agreement in a final document, any other action or statement is without effect and is immaterial in determining the terms of the contract. See PAROL EVIDENCE RULE . [Cases: Contracts 245; Evidence 397(2).C.J.S. Contracts § 416; Evidence §§ 1159–1160, 1278–1280.]

integration rule Read More »

freedom of contract

The doctrine that people have the right to bind themselves legally; a judicial concept that contracts are based on mutual agreement and free choice, and thus should not be hampered by external control such as governmental interference. • This is the principle that people are able to fashion their relations by private agreements, esp. as

freedom of contract Read More »

offensive

offensive ([schwa]-fen-siv), adj. 1. Of or for attack (an offensive weapon). 2. Unpleasant or disagreeable to the senses; obnoxious (an offensive odor). 3. Causing displeasure, anger, or resentment; esp., repugnant to the prevailing sense of what is decent or moral (patently offensive language and photographs). See OBSCENE.

offensive Read More »

terminal disclaimer

Patents. A patent applicant’s statement shortening the term of the patent. • To revive an abandoned application for a design application or for a utility or plant application filed before June 8, 1995, the applicant must disclaim a period equal to the duration of abandonment. A terminal disclaimer may also be required in an application

terminal disclaimer Read More »

sandbagging

sandbagging, n. 1. A trial lawyer’s remaining cagily silent when a possible error occurs at trial, with the hope of preserving an issue for appeal if the court does not correct the problem. • Such a tactic does not usu. preserve the issue for appeal because objections must be promptly made to alert the trial

sandbagging Read More »

Scroll to Top